Boohoo bosses knew about ‘very serious issues’ over low pay, report reveals 

Boohoo bosses knew about ‘very serious issues’ over low pay and poor working conditions at Leicester clothing factories MONTHS before scandal was exposed, report reveals

  • A new report revealed Boohoo bosses knew about issues at Leicester factories
  • Alison Levitt QC, hired by Boohoo, found no evidence of any crimes committed
  • But she said senior directors knew about poor working conditions and low pay

Bosses at Boohoo had known about the issues over low pay and poor working conditions at their Leicester clothes factories for months before the scandal was exposed, a new report has revealed.

Alison Levitt QC was hired by Boohoo to review its business practices and she says that she found no evidence of any crimes being committed.

However, she did say that there was evidence of staff at the Leicester factories working in poor conditions for low pay. 

Bosses at Boohoo had known about the issues over low pay and poor working conditions at their Leicester clothes factories a new report has said. Pictured: Mahmud Kamani (right), co-founder of Boohoo with his son Umar Kamani (left)

She said: ‘From (at the very latest) December 2019, senior Boohoo directors knew for a fact that there were very serious issues about the treatment of factory workers in Leicester,’ Ms Levitt said.

‘Whilst it put in place a programme intended to remedy this, it did not move quickly enough.’

However, directors were aware of questions over its supply chain much earlier after reporters and politicians raised the issue.

In May 2018 the Financial Times published a story about ‘labour exploitation in Britain’s garment industry’ which questioned how Boohoo was able to sell dresses so cheaply.

Months later, in November 2018, MPs grilled then co-chief executive Carol Kane about the prices of its goods.

Alison Levitt QC was hired by Boohoo to review its business practises and she says that she found no evidence of any crimes being committed. Pictured: Faiza fashion factory in Leicester where Boohoo clothing is made

Alison Levitt QC was hired by Boohoo to review its business practises and she says that she found no evidence of any crimes being committed. Pictured: Faiza fashion factory in Leicester where Boohoo clothing is made

Ms Levitt was appointed to review the company’s supply chain after worries over Leicester’s garment factories resurfaced when the city was put under lock lockdown because of Covid-19.

The Sunday Times published a series of claims in July about conditions in Leicester factories during the local lockdown in the city.

Issues had also been highlighted as early as 2017 by Channel 4, and the BBC and the Guardian had both reported on problems in Leicester before the Sunday Times’s report.

Ms Levitt said that Boohoo ‘capitalised on the commercial opportunities offered by lockdown and believed that it was supporting Leicester factories by not cancelling orders, but took no responsibility for the consequences for those who made the clothes they sold’.

Boohoo CEO John Lyttle said Levitt's review identified unacceptable issues in Boohoo's supply chain

Boohoo CEO John Lyttle said Levitt’s review identified unacceptable issues in Boohoo’s supply chain

However, the she also placed a part of the blame away from Boohoo.

She said: ‘Inaction by the authorities has contributed significantly to the deficiencies… If the law is not enforced, this sends a clear message that the violations are not important and the people affected do not matter.’

Responding to the report, Boohoo chief executive John Lyttle said: ‘Ms Levitt’s Independent Review … has identified significant and clearly unacceptable issues in our supply chain, and the steps we had taken to address them, but it is clear that we need to go further and faster to improve our governance, oversight and compliance.

‘As a result, the Group is implementing necessary enhancements to its supplier audit and compliance procedures, and the board’s oversight of these matters will increase significantly.

‘As a board, we recognise that we need to rebuild confidence that these matters will be dealt with appropriately and sensitively, and that they will not recur.’