A sign has been taken down for its ‘resemblance to a racist golliwog doll’ after thousands of campaigners demanded it.
But locals have petitioned for it to be put back up and say it will be returned after ‘a lick of black paint’.
Over 28,000 people signed a petition demanding that the caricature of a black man be taken down from the 18th century Greenman pub sign in Ashbourne, Derbyshire.
Derbyshire Dales District Council said on Monday it would remove the sign with ‘immediate effect’ but when the head was taken down on Monday evening, locals said they had done so to protect it.
Derbyshire Dales District Council took down a sign after a petition with more than 28,000 signatures
The council said they have taken it down because it is a ‘public safety issue’ but that whether it stays up ‘requires urgent discussion and consultation’
Mark Redfern said: ‘The head will be restored while on the ground and returned to its position at a later date.
‘Saved by the people of Ashbourne.’
In a Facebook post, Mr Redfern said the head would be given ‘a lick of black paint’ and claimed the move was to save it from vandalism.
The petition against the head drew inspiration from an anti-racism demonstration in Bristol, which saw protesters topple the statue of slave trader Edward Colston before dragging the monument into the harbour.
The Grade II-listed pub sign, which arches over St John’s Street, depicted the face of a black man, which one anthropology student from the town said resembled the a golliwog.
A golliwog is a 19th century rag doll which is considered racist for its exaggerated and offensive features.
But another petition has been launched to ‘save’ the sign and campaigners hung a sign on it reading ‘save me’ before it was taken down
People think the face is offensive for its alleged resemblance to the racist 19th century golliwog doll
The anthropology student said: ‘I think people are ashamed of it.’
‘Having it in the middle of the street in a small town is so unwelcoming.
‘It should have been taken down a long time ago and put in a museum.’
Matthew Holt, an international relations student from Ashbourne, also signed the petition, stating: ‘It seems such an obvious racist sign.
‘I think it’s important we address our history; we can’t change it but this shouldn’t be displayed in the public eye.
‘It should be in a museum where we can learn about it with a description to contextualise it.’
Their demands prompted Derbyshire Dales District Council’s decision to remove the monument from the sign.
A council spokesman said earlier: ‘We’re removing the head from the sign with immediate effect.
‘We agree that the sign itself is not only a public safety concern right now, but that this is an issue that requires urgent discussion and consultation.
‘The sign was gifted to the district council a number of years ago and is currently protected by a Grade II structure listing.
‘Legally, only Heritage England or the Secretary of State can remove this listing, which means we need to take on board the views of our own councillors and local people before taking forward any representations. This will happen soon.’
Following the petition, hundreds have now signed a counter-petition to save the imagery
However, a petition has also been launched which seeks to keep the monument in place, with supporters stating it is a part of history.
On the petition page, which has garnered more than 2,700 signatures, organiser Shaun Redfern, 17, from Ashbourne, described the sign as a tourist attraction which ‘should be kept because of the history for the town’.
He said: ‘I believe that the sign is not even the smallest bit racist.’
He added: ‘Are we supposed to deny our past now and get rid of old artefacts?’
A sign saying ‘save Me’ was hung from the head on Monday evening before the face was taken down.
Global Black Lives Matter protests were sparked when George Floyd died after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for almost ten minutes and a number of petitions are demanding controversial monuments in the UK are taken down.
Pictured: Protesters transporting the statue of slave trader Edward Colston towards the river Avon
In Edinburgh, a petition was launched to remove the statue of slave owner Henry Dundas in St Andrew Square and for streets bearing his name to be renamed.
Petition organiser and local resident Nancy Barrett, 22, said: ‘I feel as though Scotland’s involvement in the slave trade has been silently swept under the rug and a lot of people think Scotland is innocent, which isn’t the case.
‘The height of the statue alone shows how highly Henry Dundas was thought of when it was erected.
‘If it were to be removed it would denounce the glorification of him, and force people to learn about who he really was.
‘The longer it stays up, the longer Scotland is denying its past by refusing to amend something that should have happened years ago.’
In Wales, Cardiff’s first black Lord Mayor, Dan De’Ath, is calling on local councillors to remove the statue of Sir Thomas Picton, stating it is ‘no longer acceptable’ for it to remain in City Hall.
In a letter to the leader of Cardiff Council, he said: ‘As you may be aware, Picton was celebrated for his role in the Peninsular War and for being the highest-ranking officer killed at Waterloo.
‘Picton also served as governor of Trinidad where he oversaw an authoritarian and highly brutal regime.’
He continued: ‘Picton was also accused of the execution of a dozen slaves and his considerable fortune was due in a large part to the slave trade.’
Another petition was launched to take down the statue of Robert Clive, known as Clive of India, in The Square in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, which described the 18th century figure as ‘nothing more than an figure of oppression and white supremacy’.
Similarly, thousands of people have signed two new petitions calling for the statue of British colonialist Cecil Rhodes to be taken down from Oriel College at the University of Oxford.