Scientists identify the chemicals causing the hull of Henry VIII’s warship the Mary Rose to degrade

Scientists have identified the chemical compound causing the hull of the Mary Rose, Henry VIII’s famous warship, to degrade — offering hope for its preservation.

The Mary Rose was salvaged in 1982, following some four centuries on the seabed of the Solent where she sank on July 19, 1545 in a battle against the French fleet.

Recovery of the carrack-type warship — dubbed ‘England’s Pompeii’ by historian David Starkey — has provided valuable insights into Tudor society.

Artefacts recovered from the wreck have included weapons, sailing equipment, naval supplies and varies possessions and items used by the crew.

However, the wreck’s removal from the water has allowed the formation of acidic, sulphur-based compounds that are breaking down the wood of the hull. 

To better understand this process, experts analysed wood samples taken from the vessel at different stages of its conservation.

The team found that damaging sulphur compounds can be found up to 0.47 inches into the hull’s timber — especially in the presence of iron and zinc deposits.

The findings of the study — the first ever to monitor this kind of degradation over time — could help guide future efforts to stop the acidic compounds from forming.

The results follow the staving off of a different threat to the vessel last month, when Historic England gave £25,000 to maintain conservation efforts amid COVID-19.

The Mary Rose Museum in Portsmouth was forced to close its doors on March 18 due to lockdown — with the future of the vessel beyond this year remaining uncertain.

Scientists identify the chemical compound that is causing the hull of the Mary Rose, Henry VIII’s famous warship (pictured), to degrade — offering hope for its preservation

The Mary Rose was salvaged in 1982, following some four centuries on the seabed of the Solent where she sank on July 19, 1545 in a battle against the French fleet, pictured

The Mary Rose was salvaged in 1982, following some four centuries on the seabed of the Solent where she sank on July 19, 1545 in a battle against the French fleet, pictured

MARY ROSE: STATS 

Pictured, the Mary Rose and King Henry VIII as seen on a UK postage stamp from 1982

Pictured, the Mary Rose and King Henry VIII as seen on a UK postage stamp from 1982

Sailed under: Tudor Navy 

Home port: Portsmouth, England 

Weight: 500, refit to 700 tons

Length: Estimated at 148 feet (45 m)

Style: Four-masted carrack 

Ordnance: 78–91 guns

Crew compliment: 400–450

Constructed: 1510–1512

Years of service: 33 

Sank: 1545, mid-battle, in the Solent

Wreck discovered: 1971

Wreck raised: 1982

According to historians, the Mary Rose sank north of the Isle of Wight while engaging an invasion force of French galleys. 

The vessel — which had served for 33 years — had been extensively modified over time, and it is believe that she had gained so much additional weight in the form of cannons that the warship had become unstable. 

Executing a turn — and reportedly caught in a gust of wind — the ship tilted such that water was able to pour into her gunports, sinking her, after which the warship became buried in silt on the seafloor that preserved around 40 per cent of the hull.

Having sunk and been buried, the wreck was subject to colonisation by anaerobic bacteria which release a compound called hydrogen sulphide. 

While harmless enough in the oxygen-free environment beneath the sea bed, raising the vessel has allowed this hydrogen sulphide to react with the oxygen in the atmosphere to form corrosive sulphuric acid and sulphate salts.

This issue is made worse by the fact that the Mary Rose contains a considerable amount of iron — in the form of nails, bolts, and cannons  — which catalyses the acid production.

Conservators have been considering spraying the vessel’s hull with tiny particles of strontium carbonate — a treatment which would trap the sulphur in the wood to form non-reactive compounds that would not damage the wreck further.

Any such treatment, however, requires a detailed understanding of the chemical processes taking place within the Mary Rose’s fragile timbers. 

Following the Mary Rose’s salvage on October 11, 1982, the remains of the warship’s hull was treated with various sprays intended to help ensure her preservation.

Initially, cold water was used to limited biological activity and prevent the previously-submerged wood from drying out,

Had this been allowed, the hull material would have shrunk by around 20–50 per cent while undergoing severe cracking and warping as water evaporated from the cellular structure of the previously waterlogged wood.

The recovery of the carrack-type warship — dubbed 'England's Pompeii' by historian David Starkey — has provided valuable insights into Tudor society. Pictured, the wreck of the Mary Rose is lifted onto a barge by the crane of the barge Tog Mor on October 11, 1982

The recovery of the carrack-type warship — dubbed ‘England’s Pompeii’ by historian David Starkey — has provided valuable insights into Tudor society. Pictured, the wreck of the Mary Rose is lifted onto a barge by the crane of the barge Tog Mor on October 11, 1982

Artefacts recovered from the wreck have included weapons, sailing equipment, naval supplies and varies possessions and items used by the crew. However, the wreck's removal from the water has allowed the formation of acidic compounds that are breaking down the hull

Artefacts recovered from the wreck have included weapons, sailing equipment, naval supplies and varies possessions and items used by the crew. However, the wreck’s removal from the water has allowed the formation of acidic compounds that are breaking down the hull

Beginning in 1994, conservators began treating the Mary Rose with varying molecular weights of polyethylene glycol (PEG) — initially to replace the water in the cellular structure of the wood, and subsequently to seal the timber’s surface.

Only in 2013 — more than three decades after she was raised from the seafloor — was the vessel allowed to begin to dry out in a specially controlled environment, removing residual water while minimising resulting shrinkage and warping.

In their newly-published study, Mary Rose Trust head of conservation Ellie Schofield and colleagues took core samples from six locations across the warship’s hull for analysis — both during the PEG treatment and again during the drying phase.

Mary Rose Trust head of conservation Ellie Schofield (pictured with a sample from the vessel) and colleagues took core samples from six locations across the warship's hull for analysis — both during the PEG conservation treatment and again during the drying phase

Mary Rose Trust head of conservation Ellie Schofield (pictured with a sample from the vessel) and colleagues took core samples from six locations across the warship’s hull for analysis — both during the PEG conservation treatment and again during the drying phase

According to paper author Giannantonio Cibin of the Diamond Light Source, the team used a particle accelerator known as a synchrotron to perform various analyses on the hull samples taken from the Mary Rose during the conservation process. Pictured: the Mary Rose as seen during the PEG spray treatment (top left) and the subsequent drying phase (top right). The experts took core samples from six locations across the warship's hull for analysis (bottom)

According to paper author Giannantonio Cibin of the Diamond Light Source, the team used a particle accelerator known as a synchrotron to perform various analyses on the hull samples taken from the Mary Rose during the conservation process. Pictured: the Mary Rose as seen during the PEG spray treatment (top left) and the subsequent drying phase (top right). The experts took core samples from six locations across the warship’s hull for analysis (bottom)

According to paper author Giannantonio Cibin of the Diamond Light Source, the team used a particle accelerator known as a synchrotron to perform various analyses on the hull samples taken from the Mary Rose during the conservation process.

For example, a technique known as ‘X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy’ allowed the team to determine the exact nature of the sulphur compounds attacking the vessel, and ‘X-ray fluorescence imaging’ to determine where these are located.

A third technique — ‘Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy’ — enabled the researchers to assess how degraded the wood itself had become.

According to historians, the Mary Rose sank north of the Isle of Wight while engaging an invasion force of French galleys. Pictured, a depiction of the Mary Rose in her heyday

According to historians, the Mary Rose sank north of the Isle of Wight while engaging an invasion force of French galleys. Pictured, a depiction of the Mary Rose in her heyday

The vessel — which had served for 33 years — had been extensively modified over time, and it is believe that she had gained so much additional weight in the form of cannons that the warship had become unstable. Executing a turn — and reportedly caught in a gust of wind — the ship tilted such that water was able to pour into her gunports, sinking her Pictured, part of the Cowdray Engraving showing, centre, the sinking Mary Rose

The vessel — which had served for 33 years — had been extensively modified over time, and it is believe that she had gained so much additional weight in the form of cannons that the warship had become unstable. Executing a turn — and reportedly caught in a gust of wind — the ship tilted such that water was able to pour into her gunports, sinking her Pictured, part of the Cowdray Engraving showing, centre, the sinking Mary Rose

‘This allowed the quantitative study of these complex systems and has shed vital light on the evolution of complex sulphur-based compounds lodged in Mary Rose timbers as a function of drying time,’ Dr Cibin added.

The researchers found that the damaging, oxidised sulphur can be found up to 0.47 inches (12 millimetres) into the dried timber that makes up the hull of the Mary Rose. 

Analysis also revealed that the areas exhibiting the most degradation of the timber were found where there were also iron and zinc deposits — highlighting their potential roles in the breakdown of the wood’s internal structure.

‘We now have a uniquely detailed picture of wood deterioration,’ said paper author and Mary Rose Trust head of conservation & collections care Ellie Schofield.

‘This study is the first time we have been able to show the correlation between metal deposits, sulphur speciation and degradation of Mary Rose wood samples as a function of drying time and depth into the wood.’

The full findings of the study were published in the journal ChemPlusChem.

The researchers, pictured, found that the damaging, oxidised sulphur can be found up to 0.47 inches (12 millimetres) into the dried timber that makes up the hull of the Mary Rose. Analysis also revealed that the areas exhibiting the most degradation of the timber were found where there were also iron and zinc deposits — highlighting their potential roles in the breakdown of the wood's internal structure

The researchers, pictured, found that the damaging, oxidised sulphur can be found up to 0.47 inches (12 millimetres) into the dried timber that makes up the hull of the Mary Rose. Analysis also revealed that the areas exhibiting the most degradation of the timber were found where there were also iron and zinc deposits — highlighting their potential roles in the breakdown of the wood’s internal structure

HOW THE MARY ROSE WAS SALVAGED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SOLENT

The vessel, Henry VIII’s flagship, was put on display in the Mary Rose museum exactly 471 years after it perished in the Solent, just outside Portsmouth Harbour, on July 19, 1545. 

The Mary Rose sank in battle with the French, killing more than 500 men. 

Incredibly, the starboard hull remained intact by being embedded in mud on the seabed, which prevented it from being eroded by tides and bacteria. 

For decades, it was constantly coated with millions of litres of finely-sprayed, fresh water at a temperature of less than 5°C (41°F). That process, along with a series of wax chemicals, were used to stop the wood drying out and to inhibit bacterial activity.

Then, in 1985, the ship was turned upright and titanium props were installed to support the internal structure and work was undertaken to remove as much sediment as possible.

From 1994, active conservation commenced with the spraying of Polyethylene Glycol (Peg), a water-soluble polymer which can penetrate deep into the wood and support the cell walls. 

Then, in April 2013, the Peg sprays were turned off and the hull was kept in a state of controlled air-drying phase 100 tonnes of water during the next four to five years.

Once drying was complete, the internal walls surrounding the hull were removed so visitors would be able to see a completely unobstructed view of the hull.

However, the drying process has caused unwanted movement which they are now monitoring with special cameras as they try to prop up the ship using scaffolding.