Developer is found not guilty of drowning his wealthy heiress wife at their Danish holiday home

The trial of a property developer accused of murdering his wealthy heiress wife in a holiday drowning ‘accident’ in Denmark to get his hands on a ‘vast fortune’ has collapsed.

In the prosecution case against Donald McPherson, 47, seven ‘secret’ life insurance policies had been taken on his ‘besotted’ wife Paula Leeson, 47, and he stood to gain £3.5million if she died.

But on Wednesday in the third week of the trial, judge Mr Justice Goose halted proceedings in the absence of the jury, citing insufficient evidence for jurors to safely convict the defendant, who denied murder, as the prosecution case was built on circumstantial evidence.

This was despite the judge saying foul play was ‘more likely’ to have caused her death than an accident.

As the ruling to stop the trial was made, Ms Leeson’s father, Irish businessman Willy Leeson, broke down in tears along with his wife Betty, as they sat in the public gallery yards from the defendant.

Mr Leeson shouted: ‘Oh God, oh God, unbelievable.’ His son Neville Leeson shouted to the judge: ‘God Almighty. You are making a big mistake.’

Paula Leeson, 47

Donald McPherson (left), 47, from Sale, Greater Manchester, was accused of drowning his wife Paula Leeson (right), 47, while on holiday at a rented cottage with a swimming pool in Denmark

The family were absent from court on Thursday as Mr Justice Goose formally directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant.

He told the jury: ‘I have come to the conclusion that as a matter of law that the evidence in relation to how Paula Leeson came to drown is not sufficiently strong to allow you to reach a proper verdict in relation to the defendant causing it by killing her.’

The judge’s ruling to halt the trial was given to lawyers on Wednesday in the absence of the jury and could not be immediately reported.

The prosecution was given overnight while CPS lawyers ‘at the highest levels’ considered appealing against the ruling.

On Thursday morning, prosecutor David McLachlan QC told the court there are no reasonable grounds for appeal.

McPherson, who sat in the dock with his arms folded, wearing a black jogging suit and blue mask, made no reaction as he was discharged and told he was free to go.

He had been held in HMP Forest Bank.

Mr Justice Goose directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant. Pictured: Manchester Crown Court

Mr Justice Goose directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant. Pictured: Manchester Crown Court

The judge added: ‘I understand how difficult it will be therefore for the family to accept from their point of view the loss of a daughter. This court has obvious sympathy for them but the law must be applied equally.’

Ms Leeson, described as an otherwise healthy mother-of-one, drowned in a 4ft deep swimming pool at a holiday cottage while the couple were on a break in Denmark, on June 6, 2017.

The day after, the defendant transferred £27,000 from their joint account to his personal accounts to clear his £67,000 debts and seven days later he joined a group, Widowed and Young, he described as ‘Like Tinder for widows’, jurors were told.

Property developer ‘dropped from space’ into wife’s life, court hears

Donald McPherson hid his life story from Paula Leeson and her family and instead used a ‘cover story’, his murder trial heard, as he claimed to have been an orphan ‘dumped’ by his family to live with foster parents.

McPherson, born Alexander James Lang, in fact grew up in Takapuna, New Zealand, living with his father Lawrence, originally from Manchester, and mother Pamela.

He has two older sisters, Sharon and Pandora, and left home aged 19.

Little is known about his life before he met Ms Leeson around 2015 and he did not intend to give evidence from the witness box in his defence.

In the event the judge halted his prosecution for his wife’s murder before the defence case began, formally directing the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict.

While working as a property developer, buying and selling houses in the Manchester area over the past decade, McPherson completed several buy-to-let mortgage applications.

On the forms he claimed to have worked at Commerzbank in Germany and as a consultant for South Pacific Oil and Gas.

He also gave his occupation as a labourer, joiner, computer programmer and electrician.

Ms Leeson’s brother Neville said McPherson ‘just landed as if he dropped from space’ after she introduced him to the family.

He claimed to own five properties, including a farm in New Zealand, though he was not a man of means but a ‘man of straw’, the jury heard.

There were no properties in New Zealand and he was heavily in debt in the UK after buying and selling houses.

Despite owning several houses as a property developer in the UK, he had substantial mortgages on all of them.

It was through the Leeson family’s skip hire business that he met his future wife.

McPherson always paid cash and often carried a bundle of notes wrapped in an elastic band.

Ms Leeson did not know about his secret hobby – he was taking flight lessons to get a private pilot licence and spent around £17,000 at a flying school.

His trial was told it was ‘a bit of a laugh’ at the flying school as when his wife would call, he would use his drill and say: ‘I’m just in the loft Paula, I will ring you back.’

McPherson is also known to have used aliases, including the name Rob Jones, used both online and in person.

He was taciturn with his wife’s family, headed by her father William, a successful businessman.

McPherson rarely engaged in conversation and it was said he ‘resented the fact that Willy Leeson sat on his great wealth’, the court heard.

It was said to be odd that at their wedding McPherson did not have any friends, and the groom said his original best man from New Zealand was not able to come as his partner had died in childbirth – this was ‘yet another’ lie, jurors were told.

At an earlier court hearing, the judge was told McPherson is ‘known in other jurisdictions’ but there was no further explanation.

 

Pathologists found 13 separate injuries on Ms Leeson’s body, which jurors heard may have been sustained while being restrained or in a rescue and resuscitation attempt.

Crucially, an accidental death could not be ruled out.

Stopping the trial, Mr Justice Goose said there were two available possibilities: Firstly, McPherson restrained his wife under water or overcame her in a struggle or pushed her to cause her to drown; Or secondly, Ms Leeson drowned by an accident, by a trip, fall or a faint, causing her to fall into the water.

He added: ‘Whilst the first of those alternatives is clearly more likely, that does not mean that a jury, on the face of the pathological evidence alone, could be sure of it.’

He said whilst the ‘substantial body of circumstantial evidence’ has caused ‘strong suspicion’ McPherson may have caused his wife’s death, it is ‘insufficient’ to disprove it was an accident.

Prosecutor Mr McLachlan told the jury Ms Leeson’s death ‘at first glance’ appeared to be a tragic accident, but he alleged it was ‘a sinister pre-planned killing’ by her husband, who was born Alexander James Lang and originally from New Zealand.

Ms Leeson’s family had told the jury McPherson ‘appeared out of nowhere’ and after a ‘whirlwind romance’ the couple wed two years after meeting in a ‘no expense spared’ ceremony at Peckforton Castle, Cheshire, in June 2014.

In the four years before her death, the court heard that 

 seven life insurance policies had been take out on Ms Leeson and by 2016 was paying £464.47p-a-month premiums.

The premiums were always paid despite McPherson sometimes being overdrawn as his debts began to ‘spiral out of control’ after buying and selling properties, the court heard.

As a birthday present, McPherson booked them a trip to a cottage in Norre Nebel on the coast of remote western Denmark in June 2017 – despite his wife ‘hating’ beach holidays.

On the day of her death, a health data app on Ms Leeson’s phone recorded her last movement at 1.13pm.

The next movement on McPherson’s phone was 26 minutes later, and at 1.46pm he called the emergency services.

McPherson told Danish police his wife had complained of stomach ache and toothache and she had been sick and they had both been in bed.

When he awoke his wife was gone and he found her fully clothed, face down in the swimming pool, not moving.

He said he struggled to pull her out, partly due to a shoulder injury, and called for an ambulance.

The Danish paramedic told the court she was already dead when they arrived and a doctor pronounced life extinct at 2.26pm.

Her death was initially treated as a tragic accident by the Danish authorities.

But as a routine post-mortem examination was carried out, bleeding was discovered in Ms Leeson’s neck and the procedure halted and police called.

Separate external injuries were recorded to her face and arms, described as bruises, abrasions or haemorrhages, with more internal injuries, including bleeding to the back of her neck, forehead and both temples.

Danish authorities initially concluded her death was ‘assumed accidental’, but later ruled the conclusion must be changed to ‘undetermined’.

They had been told Ms Leeson could not swim and had drowned in a pool with a depth of 5ft 9in.

Her family say she did not like swimming or water, she learned to swim at school and the pool was in fact under 4ft deep, with Ms Leeson 5ft 5in tall.

The court heard Ms Leeson had stood to inherit ‘millions’ from the family business owned by her father, who had built up a successful groundwork and skip hire firm in Sale, Greater Manchester, after emigrating from County Wicklow, Ireland, in the 1960s.

She oversaw the skip hire business – where she met McPherson, who renovated and sold on property.

He falsely claimed to own property in New Zealand, and gave the impression he was a ‘man of means’, but in reality was a ‘man of straw’ with substantial debt from property dealing, the court heard.

John Ryder QC, defending, in applying for the trial to be halted, said the prosecution case was entirely circumstantial, there was no real evidence against the defendant and it all amounted to, ‘He must have done it.’

McPherson, in a statement through his solicitors, said: ‘A tragic accident is what it was and it saddens me, deeply, that the events in question should ever have been seen differently and that I was ever suspected of playing a part in Paula’s death.’