The legal back and forth between Kelly Clarkson and estranged husband Brandon Blackstock is getting increasingly tense after the American Idol alum’s legal team responded to Blacksock’s denial he and his father defrauded Clarkson out of millions.
Clarkson and Blackstock have been waging a legal war against one another since October, when Kelly’s former father-in-law Narvel Blackstock filed a lawsuit alleging she still owed them $1.5 million in commissions and $4 million from her paycheck for judging The Voice.
Kelly fired back with a counter-suit, claiming that her agreement with the Blackstocks and their company Starstuck Entertainment should be voided and she should be reimbursed for all prior fees because they were providing ‘illegal services’ under California’s Talent Agencies Act for working without a license and failing to act in the ‘best interest’ of their client.
‘We stand by our allegations that Starstruck violated the Talent Agencies Act, despite their boilerplate denials, and we look forward to trying the case before the Labor Commissioner in August,’ Clarkson’s team shared in a new statement to Entertainment Tonight.
Standing her ground: Kelly Clarkson’s camp has doubled down on allegations her estranged husband Brandon Blackstock defrauded her of millions during his time as her manager, telling ET they ‘stand by’ their claims while dismissing Blackson’s ‘boilerplate denials.’ Above 2020
Blackstock thoroughly denied Clarkson’s accusations in November filings with the California Labor Commission that emerged online Tuesday.
He disputed claims he and his father has scammed the artist by tacking exorbitant fees onto his company Starstruck Entertainment’s bills.
But Brandon’s attorneys Bryan J. Freedman and Jesse A. Kaplan argued that they are not subject to California’s Talent Agencies Act because they did not perform their work in the Golden State.
Kelly’s lawyer Edwin McPherson believes that the American Idol alum is entitled to all of the money as well as other ‘things of value’ that Brandon was paid while acting as her agent.
The Blackstocks’ legal representation further claimed any alleged violations that there is a one-year statute of limitations in the Talent Agencies Act, meaning even if Clarkson could prove her accusations it’s possible for his lawyers to argue she can only claim commissions paid within the year prior to her October 2020 filing.
Blackstock is asking for Clarkson’s petition to be dismissed and for her to pay his legal fees.
Clarkson and Blackson’s legal battle began when father-in-law Narvel Blackstock filed a lawsuit against her last October with allegations she still owed them $1.5 million in commissions, on top of another $4 million she was set to pay them as a result of her judging role on The Voice.
His side: Blackstock is deny accusations he defrauded the star while acting as her agent during their relationship. Pictured 2020 above
Different rule book: Blackstock and father Narvel’s lawyers say they are not subject to California’s Talent Agencies Act and that if they were a one-year statue of limitations would curb how much restitution Kelly could recoup. Above Narval, Kelly, and Brandon are seen with the elder Blackstock’s ex-wife Reba McEntire
Kelly then countersued, asking the agreement to be voided, a refund for all past payments made by Clarkson, and a stop to any further payments to the company.
‘Based on the wrongful acts and conduct of [Starstruck Management and the Blackstocks] … all agreements between the parties, should be declared void and unenforceable, no monies should be paid by Petitioners to Respondents, and all monies previously paid by Petitioners to Respondents should be disgorged from Respondents, forthwith,’ the petition reads.
Clarkson’s petition claims Starstruck demanded ‘unconscionable fees and compensation… for illegal services’, acted ‘in conflict of interest with the best interest of Petitioners’, and gave ‘false information’.
The petition also alleges Starstruck made ‘false representations to and/or concealing material information from [Clarkson] concerning certain matters relating to [Starstruck’s] engagement’, which was ‘in violation of Section 1700.32 of the California Labor Code.’
Clarkson also alleges the company failed the get her written approval to act as her agent.
Bryan Freedman, a lawyer for Starstruck, told TMZ of the filing: ‘The labor petition conveniently ignores the fact that Kelly had her own licensed talent agency CAA at all times. While Starstruck Management Group provided talent management services on her behalf, it did so at all times that CAA was her agency of record.’
Tit for tat: Clarkson and Blackson’s legal battle began when father-in-law Narvel Blackstock filed a lawsuit against her last October with allegations she still owed them $1.5 million in commissions, on top of another $4 million she was set to pay them as a result of her judging role on The Voice
Family ties: Clarkson shares daughter River Rose and son Remington Alexander with her ex
‘It is unfortunate that Kelly is again attempting to avoid paying commissions that are due and owing to Starstruck to try and achieve some perceived advantage in her ongoing custody and divorce proceedings.’
The legal battle is just the latest development amid Kelly’s ongoing divorce from Brandon.
After seven years of marriage and two children together, the couple separated in summer of 2020.
Kelly married Brandon at Blackberry Farm in Tennessee in 2013, and together they welcomed daughter River Rose, six, and son Remington Alexander, four.
Kelly has since been awarded primary physical custody of their two children.
The judge’s ruling on custody prompted Blackstock to file additional legal documents Monday seeking $436,000-a-month in support payments from Clarkson.
He is asking for $301,000 in spousal support and $135,000 in child support, according to TMZ.
He also requested that his soon-to-be ex-wife cover $2 million in legal fees.
Happier times: Clarkson with Brandon, their two children, and his children from a previous marriage