Huawei’s UK chairman will resign as Government bans Chinese tech giant from Britain’s 5G network

Huawei’s UK chairman is to step down early, it emerged today as the Government is set to bar the Chinese tech giant from access to Britain’s 5G network.

Lord Browne’s term was due to end in March but the former BP chief executive is now expected to depart in September.

News of his departure came as Boris Johnson blocked Huawei from the UK’s 5G network with all of the firm’s technology to be ripped out by 2027.

The move, announced by Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden in the Commons today, represents a major U-turn after the Government said in January that the Chinese tech giant would be allowed to help build the infrastructure.

A Huawei spokesman said: ‘When Lord Browne became chairman of Huawei UK’s board of directors in 2015, he brought with him a wealth of experience which has proved vital in ensuring Huawei’s commitment to corporate governance in the UK.   

Huawei’s UK chairman is to step down early, it emerged as the Government is set to bar the Chinese tech giant from playing any role in Britain’s 5G network 

The Huawei ban follows intense pressure from Donald Trump to deny China a foothold in the West’s critical infrastructure. Tough American sanctions have prevented the firm from using any US-patented technology in its microchips

The Huawei ban follows intense pressure from Donald Trump to deny China a foothold in the West’s critical infrastructure. Tough American sanctions have prevented the firm from using any US-patented technology in its microchips

Who is Lord Browne? 

Lord Browne, nee John Browne, was recruited to head a board of directors for Huawei’s UK operations in February 2015. He is best known as being the chief executive of BP in 1995-2007.

Nicknamed by employees the ‘Sun King’ for his management style, he was also praised for increasing BP’s interest in renewable energy sources. 

He joined BP as an apprentice in 1966, and held a variety of exploration and production posts in Anchorage, Alaska, New York, San Francisco, London and Canada. 

In 1984 he became Group Treasurer and Chief Executive of BP Finance International. In April 1986, he took up the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Standard Oil of Ohio in Cleveland, Ohio. In 1987, following the BP/Standard merger, in addition to his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BP America, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Standard Oil Production Company. 

In 1989, he became Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of BP Exploration based in London. In September 1991, he joined BP’s board as a Managing Director.

He was appointed Group Chief Executive on in 1995 after the UK government sold its last remaining stake in the company. 

Following the merger of BP and Amoco, he became Group Chief Executive of the combined group in December 1998 and served until May 2007. He was one of the most highly paid executives in the UK, with a remuneration package of approximately £5.7million in 2004. 

He resigned from BP in May 2007 amid allegations about his romantic life and alleged misuse of company funds. The reports led to his resignation as non-executive director of Goldman Sachs at the same time.

In March 2015, Lord Browne was appointed Executive Chairman of L1 Energy, an energy investment vehicle co-owned by Russian billionaire Mikhail Fridman.

In December 2017, it was reported that Lord Browne had led negotiations to create a new joint venture between L1 Energy and BASF, merging their respective oil and gas businesses to create Wintershall DEA.

Lord Browne is currently Chairman of the International Advisory Board of the Blavatnik School of Government at Oxford University, and Chairman of the Trustees of the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering.

He is Chairman of the Francis Crick Institute, Chairman of the Donmar Warehouse Theatre, and since September 2017 has served as Chairman of the Courtauld Institute of Art, following the end of his tenure at Tate. He is also a Trustee of the Holocaust Educational Trust.

‘He has been central to our commitment here dating back 20 years, and we thank him for his valuable contribution.’

Lord Browne told Reuters in an interview last week: ‘The UK has had a very long relationship with China and I hope it’s not one that they simply throw away.

‘It’s become very, very visible indeed, and it has become a football between the United States and China,’ he added.

Lord Browne compared the competition between China and the US in 5G and AI technologies to the Cold War space race.

‘A very similar reaction is occurring now, because it’s always been in the interests of the US to be ascendant in this area, it’s been good for the world as well,’ he said.

Ministers have been under intense pressure from Donald Trump’s White House and from backbench Tory MPs to cut ties with Huawei. 

Telecoms firms will be prohibited from purchasing any new Huawei 5G equipment after December 31 this year and all of its hardware will be removed from the network over the next seven years.

The decision, agreed by the National Security Council this morning, is likely to delay the completion of the rollout of the network by more than two years and increase costs by up to £2 billion.

The decision was made by the NSC after an assessment of the impact of new US sanctions on Huawei.

Mr Dowden said those sanctions mean the UK can ‘no longer be confident it will be able to guarantee the security of future Huawei 5G equipment’.

Huawei said the decision to ban it from the network was ‘disappointing’ and risked consigning the UK to the ‘digital slow lane’ as the firm also claimed its role in Britain had become ‘politicised’.

The announcement came on the same day that it emerged Huawei’s UK chairman is to step down early. Lord Browne’s term was due to end in March but the former BP boss is now expected to depart in September.

The decision to ban Huawei will spark Chinese government fury with Beijing having already warned Downing Street it would face ‘consequences’ if it pressed ahead with excluding the company.

But it delighted Tory MPs who have been pressuring the Government for months to reverse its decision because of national security concerns.

However, Conservative backbenchers immediately called for ministers to go even further as they said the seven year timetable for removing equipment must be speeded up.

They also expressed concerns after the Government said Huawei equipment in the UK’s 3G and 4G networks will not be stripped out because it is not judged to be a security risk.

The firm’s technology will also not be removed from the UK’s full fibre broadband network but there will be a technical consultation conducted on moving away from using Huawei in full fibre in the future.

That ‘transition period’ on full fibre is not expected to last more than two years. The reason for the slow move away from Huawei in full fibre has been blamed on the fact that it is currently one of only two available suppliers in the UK, along with Nokia. 

The two year transition will be used to try to secure other viable alternative suppliers which could be used in the full fibre network.  

The US has long urged its allies not use Huawei technology because of national security concerns – concerns which the firm has always rejected. 

Industry sources said yesterday the decision not to ban Huawei until Christmas left open the chance that US policy could change if President Trump fails to secure re-election in November

The move, announced by Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden in the Commons today, represents a major U-turn after the Government said in January that the Chinese tech giant would be allowed to help build the infrastructure

The move, announced by Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden in the Commons today, represents a major U-turn after the Government said in January that the Chinese tech giant would be allowed to help build the infrastructure. Industry sources said yesterday the decision not to ban Huawei until Christmas left open the chance that US policy could change if President Trump fails to secure re-election in November

Government claims Huawei 5G decision will not lead to mobile phone signal blackouts

Mobile phone customers will not suffer signal blackouts as a result of the decision to strip Huawei equipment from the UK’s 5G network, the Government has claimed.

Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said the timetable to take such action by 2027 was partly influenced by a desire to avoid people suffering disruption to their service.

Executives from Vodafone and BT last week warned they would need at least five years to completely remove the Chinese firm’s equipment without causing people to lose phone signal for several days.

Labour’s Tulip Siddiq highlighted these concerns in the House of Commons this afternoon and asked for assurances that this will not happen.

Mr Dowden replied: ‘(Ms Siddiq) is absolutely right to raise the risk of that kind of disruption and blackouts, and that’s one of the reasons that led us to the timetable we’ve set out.

‘Put bluntly, the shorter the timetable for the removal, the higher the risk of that happening.

‘But I can give (Ms Siddiq) and indeed her constituents and people up and down the country, (the assurance) that this risk will not materialise in relation to the proposals that we have outlined today.’

Mr Dowden also told MPs: ‘I would caution that cyber attacks will not be prevented by removing Huawei equipment from the system. 

‘There are vulnerabilities across the network and that’s one of the reasons why we’re introducing the Telecoms Security Bill to start to address some of those.’ 

New sanctions imposed by the White House stop Huawei from using US technology in its 5G equipment. 

Mr Dowden told MPs that the National Cyber Security Centre had assessed the impact of the sanctions and as a result had ‘significantly changed their security assessment of Huawei’s presence in the UK’s 5G network’. 

The NSC, led by Boris Johnson, weighed up the NCSC’s conclusions this morning before agreeing to exclude Huawei from the 5G network.   

The Culture Secretary said the ‘uncertainty’ over the status of Huawei’s supply chain meant the UK could ‘no longer be confident it will be able to guarantee the security of future Huawei 5G equipment’. 

He said the ‘best way to secure our networks is for operators to stop using new affected Huawei equipment to build the UK’s future 5G networks’.

As a result it will be illegal for telecoms operators to buy Huawei 5G equipment from the end of this year.

On the issue of then completely removing Huawei technology from the network, Mr Dowden said: ‘I know that honourable members have sought a commitment from the Government to remove Huawei equipment from our 5G network altogether. 

‘This is why we have concluded that it is necessary and indeed prudent to commit to a timetable for the removal of Huawei equipment from our 5G network by 2027.’ 

Mr Dowden said the removal of Huawei from the 5G network will be ‘irreversible’ as he admitted it will impact the roll out of the technology across the UK. 

He said: ‘This will delay our roll out of 5G. Our decisions in January had already set back that roll out by a year and cost up to a £1billion. 

‘Today’s decision to ban the procurement of new Huawei 5G equipment from the end of this year will delay roll out by a further year and will add up to £500 million to costs. 

‘Requiring operators in addition to remove Huawei equipment from their networks by 2027 will add hundreds of millions of pounds further to the cost and further delay roll out. 

‘This means a cumulative delay to 5G roll out of two to three years and costs of up to £2billion. This will have real consequences for the connections on which all our constituents rely.’ 

Why has the Government banned Huawei from the UK’s 5G network?

What did ministers announce today on Huawei? 

The Chinese tech giant’s equipment must be completely removed from the UK’s 5G networks by the end of 2027. Ahead of this, there will be a total ban introduced on the purchase of any new 5G hardware from Huawei after December 31 this year. Telecoms firms will also be ordered to shift away from the purchase of Huawei’s equipment for full-fibre broadband networks over a period lasting up to two years. 

What is Huawei and why is it controversial?

Huawei is a Chinese telecoms company which describes itself as a private company ‘fully owned by its employees’. But it has been criticised over its alleged close ties to the Chinese state. The country has a history of state censorship and surveillance, and under Chinese law, firms can be compelled to ‘support, co-operate with and collaborate in national intelligence work’. As a result, critics of Huawei have expressed concerns that Beijing could require the firm to install technological ‘back doors’ to enable it to spy on or disrupt Britain’s communications network. Huawei has always denied any suggestions of close links with the Chinese state or that it has ever been asked by Chinese authorities to help spy on others.

Why has the Government changed its mind now?

The UK made its decision after US sanctions were imposed on Huawei. Those sanctions effectively banned the firm from using US technology in its 5G equipment. The Government said that means it can ‘no longer be confident it will be able to guarantee the security of future Huawei 5G equipment’.

How will this affect me? 

The US sanctions and subsequent UK move does not directly affect existing Huawei devices such as smartphones, laptops and tablets. But as seen with more recent Huawei releases, such as the P40 handset, restrictions on dealings with US firms means it can no longer provide the full Android experience from Google on future devices, meaning core apps such as YouTube and the Google Play Store cannot be provided.

What about an impact on the rollout of 5G?

Today’s decision means the completed rollout of the 5G network could be delayed by two to three years.   

The decision to exclude Huawei from the 5G network will lead to a further deterioration in relations between the UK and China, with tensions already strained because of coronavirus and a row over the imposition of a new national security law on Hong Kong. 

Mr Dowden told MPs that the Government is ‘clear eyed’ on its approach to China and that ‘what we want is a modern and mature relationship with China based on mutual respect’. 

Ed Brewster, a spokesman for Huawei UK, said: ‘This disappointing decision is bad news for anyone in the UK with a mobile phone. It threatens to move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide. 

‘Instead of “levelling up” the government is levelling down and we urge them to reconsider. 

 ‘We remain confident that the new US restrictions would not have affected the resilience or security of the products we supply to the UK. 

‘Regrettably our future in the UK has become politicised, this is about US trade policy and not security.’

Arun Bansal, president of Europe and Latin America for Ericsson said the decision ‘removes the uncertainty that was slowing down investment decisions around the deployment of 5G in the UK’.

The National Cyber Security Centre’s technical director Ian Levy said today’s decision is ‘necessary for the long-term security and resilience of the UK networks’ but that the move comes with ‘significant risks and costs’.

‘The long-term health and diversity of supply in the telecoms sector is a critical issue for all, and it will take concerted, sustained, international effort to fix it,’ he said. 

The Government has faced fierce pressure from Tory MPs for months to rethink its decision in January to grant Huawei a role in the 5G network.

And while today’s move was welcomed, Conservative backbenchers said ministers needed to go further and faster as they questioned why Huawei’s 3G and 4G technology was being allowed to remain in place. 

Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said the seven year deadline for the removal of Huawei 5G technology should be brought forward to five years as he said there is ‘no reason why’ action could not be speeded up. 

He added: ‘Having said he is getting rid of them in 5G, 4G and 3G Huawei apparently are fine and they can go on for as long as anyone and they will be upgraded in software upgrades for the next decade. 

‘If they are a risk in 5G why are they not a risk to us generally?’ 

Tory backbencher Bob Seely, the co-ordinator of the 60-strong Huawei Interest Group of Conservative MPs – said the move by ministers is a ‘good first decision’ but expressed concerns about the pace of plans to remove equipment. 

‘I believe that MPs will have concerns about elements of the statement, including no ban on 3G and 4G and a rip-out date for 5G far into the distance,’ he said in a statement.

‘It does mean Huawei’s glide path out of our critical national infrastructure will be slow. It also means that BT and others could be installing already-bought Huawei kit for well after 2020.

‘Huawei is, by Government’s own definition, a high-risk vendor. We should not, on principle, have high-risk vendors in our critical national infrastructure.’