Concerns grow over improperly discarded masks

A waterways charity has issued concerns that personal protective equipment (PPE) is rapidly becoming a new litter scourge during the coronavirus pandemic. 

The huge increase in the use of single-use plastic gloves and masks being used by non-healthcare professionals will negatively impact the environment, Thames21 says.

The public health crisis has already meant dropped and discarded face masks have already become a common sight on pavements throughout the country.

But these widely-available masks feature a layer of non-woven bonded fabric to filter microorganisms from the mouth and nose – commonly made of polypropylene.

Although they keep out pathogens effectively, single-use masks have a long afterlife after they are discarded, ending up in landfill or oceans. 

Plastic waste dropped on the street can get washed into drains and enter local rivers, contaminating water with the pathogen. 

And apart from the potential risk of spreading disease, experts warn they can pose a choking hazard to wildlife. 

A switch to compulsory mask-wearing in the UK throughout the rest of the pandemic, as considered by the government, could exacerbate the problem. 

Plastic waste dropped on the street can get washed into drains and enter the local river, contaminating water with pathogens

In London, much of the plastic waste ends up in the Thames, is carried downstream and then washes up on strandlines at high tide. 

Key saltmarsh areas accumulate the plastic due to their location and ecology, with reedbeds helping to trap the waste.

‘These areas are key green spaces for Londoners and important nursery grounds for fish and birds,’ said Chris Coode, deputy CEO of waterways charity Thames21.

‘There is now so much plastic in these saltmarsh habitats that you can hear the plastic crunch underfoot as you walk along.’    

The massive increase in single-use plastic gloves and masks being used by non-healthcare professionals will negatively impact the environment, especially when these items are dumped in the environment rather than in bins, Thames21 says

The massive increase in single-use plastic gloves and masks being used by non-healthcare professionals will negatively impact the environment, especially when these items are dumped in the environment rather than in bins, Thames21 says

It’s been mandatory to wear face masks on public transport in Britain since last month and from this Friday people in Scotland will also have to wear masks when they enter shops.

The government is also still considering extending mandatory face covers to anyone who is out in public, even if they’re just walking the streets.

But should the wearing of face masks become mandatory, the public should wear reusable masks rather than single-use masks, due to environmental implications such as low biodegradability, scientists at University College London say. 

Used PPE such as face masks can pose a risk to wildlife if not disposed of properly. But even if disposed of in household waste, the used masks could potentially by sources of infection for rubbish workers

Used PPE such as face masks can pose a risk to wildlife if not disposed of properly. But even if disposed of in household waste, the used masks could potentially by sources of infection for rubbish workers

The university estimates that if every person in the UK used one single-use mask each day for a year, we would create 66,000 tons of contaminated plastic waste.

UCL has already released a policy document that sets out the environmental implications of single-use face masks. 

In comparison, evidence suggests that reusable masks, such as those made of fabric, perform most of the tasks of single-use masks without the associated waste stream. 

Most face masks available for sale are made from layers of plastics and are designed to be single-use

Most face masks available for sale are made from layers of plastics and are designed to be single-use

Reusable masks present a great eco-friendly alternative as long as they are washed after each use, the university stresses. 

Some manufacturers of reusable masks, such as Cambridge Mask and Respro, claim that their products are as effective as standard single-use masks if used correctly. 

Cambridge Mask produces respirators made with UK military-grade filtration technology and claims their masks are effective for 340 hours.  

Should wearing face masks become mandatory for the public, an extensive public health campaign with clear instructions about how to wear, remove, and wash reusable masks will be needed, UCL scientists said. 

It also outlined one of the main problems of single-use masks and other PPE, aside from the environmental issues. 

In a hospital environment, single-use protective wear are contaminated items and there are systems in place for their safe disposal, including incineration.

But waste PPE in the household is commonly placed in mixed general waste, which may put waste collectors at risk of contracting infections. 

Local councils could install special disposal units for contaminated masks in every street, as well as make hand sanitisers readily available, such as in public spaces and on transport network, UCL suggests.  

Woman making homemade face mask with a sewing machine in her home while in quarantine. Evidence shows that cloth masks, particularly those with several layers of cotton cloth, block droplets from the wearer's mouth and nose from entering the atmosphere

Woman making homemade face mask with a sewing machine in her home while in quarantine. Evidence shows that cloth masks, particularly those with several layers of cotton cloth, block droplets from the wearer’s mouth and nose from entering the atmosphere  

The UK government appears to be yielding to pressure over more thorough mandatory guidelines for the waeering of face masks.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock revealed this week that the government will look again at whether people in England should wear face coverings or masks while out in public.

Speaking in the House of Commons, the Health Secretary replied ‘yes’ when asked whether officials would reconsider the existing advice in England.

Current rules say people must wear a covering over their nose and mouth when they are on public transport — but they aren’t mandatory anywhere else. 

The president of the Royal Society said this week that everyone should wear a face covering in public to reduce the risk of a second wave of Covid-19 infections. 

Professor Venki Ramakrishnan said people should wear a mask when they leave home – particularly in enclosed indoor spaces – but acknowledged that the public remain ‘sceptical’ about the benefits.

Not wearing them outside the home should be considered as ‘anti-social’ as drink-driving, or failing to wear a seat belt, he said this week. 

‘The virus has not been eliminated, so, as we lift lockdown and people increasingly interact with each other, we need to use every tool we have to reduce the risk of a second wave of infection,’ said Professor Ramakrishnan.

The UK government has instructions on its website on how people can make their own face mask from leftover clothing. 

COVID-19 WASTE AND THE SAFE SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVES 

1. Hand Sanitiser vs Soap

Hand sanitiser has been in high demand globally during 2020, but the 70% alcohol gel which kills bacteria and viruses (including COVID-19) often comes in a plastic bottle.

To reduce plastic consumption, consider switching to a bar of soap and warm water for washing your hands. 

Bars of soap can often be found in entirely biodegradable packaging, making the impact on the environment considerably less than hand sanitiser. 

Alternatively, opting for liquid soap which can be refilled would allow you to reduce your plastic consumption without major changes to your lifestyle.

Ensuring you follow hand washing advice, the government states washing your hands is as effective as hand sanitiser for reducing the risk of getting ill.

2. Disposable Masks vs Washable Masks

Scientists at UCL have estimated that if every person in the UK used one single-use mask each day for a year, we would create 66,000 tonnes of contaminated plastic waste and create ten times more climate change impact than using reusable masks.

In a hospital environment, single-use protective wear such as masks and gloves are contaminated items, and there are systems in place for their safe disposal, which involve segregation and incineration.

Surgical grade N95 respirators offer the highest level of protection against COVID-19 infection, followed by surgical grade masks. 

However, evidence suggests that reusable masks perform most of the tasks of single-use masks without the associated waste stream. 

Material, reusable masks present a great eco-friendly alternative as long as they are washed after each use.

3. Plastic Bags vs Material

In October 2015, the government introduced new laws to curb the use of plastic bags in the UK. 

Since then, the number of plastic bags in the UK has dropped. 

The coronavirus, however, has seen more people turn to disposable bags, with several states in the USA banning reusable bags entirely.

Whilst the evidence is still unclear about how long COVID-19 can live on clothing, Vincent Munster, from the National Institutes of Health told the BBC that the NIH speculates ‘it desiccates rapidly’ on porous materials. 

General advice is instead of ditching reusable bags, to ensure they are washed regularly and anyone who comes into contact with them also washes their hands.

4. Coffee Cups vs Reusables

Coffee cups have been a large focus for plastic-free campaigners in recent years. 

However, as lockdown restrictions have eased and coffee shops have begun to reopen, many are returning to throw-away coffee cups to reduce the risk of contracting the virus. 

Several large coffee chains, which previously accepted reusable coffee cups, have also halted the use of them amid safety concerns.

Despite widespread concerns, more than 100 scientists, doctors, and academics have endorsed the sensible use of reusable containers as safe and unlikely to contribute to the further spread of COVID-19. 

Reusable cups should be washed thoroughly with hot water and soap.

5. Takeaway Pint Glasses vs #PlasticFreePints

As pubs reopened at the weekend, many were turning to plastic cups in order to aid takeaway orders and to reduce the need for staff to touch used glasses.

Similarly to the reusable coffee cups, if washed thoroughly, a reusable glass or tumbler could be a simple sustainable swap to help curb the growing coronavirus waste problem.

Ours to Save, a platform for global climate news, and EcoDisco, a sustainable events company, have created the #PlasticFreePints initiative to encourage pub-goers to use reusable alternatives in place of the typical single-use plastic on offer. 

Source: money.co.uk