Anti-vaxxer Pete Evans’ attempt to trick 60 Minutes backfires

Anti-vaxxer and conspiracy theorist Pete Evans thought he’d beaten 60 Minutes at their own game when he demanded to film his interview with Liz Hayes for his two million social media followers.

The former My Kitchen Rules judge had no doubt hoped his uncut version would reveal ‘the truth’ instead of the mainstream media’s pro-science narrative.

But his efforts backfired badly on Sunday night when the full interview showed him rambling endlessly and failing to answer basic questions.

Checkmate: Anti-vaxxer and conspiracy theorist Pete Evans thought he’d beaten 60 Minutes at their own game when he demanded to film his interview with Liz Hayes for his two million social media followers. But he was sadly mistaken

Most damaging of all, however, the footage laid bare Pete’s own hypocrisy.

For a decade, the 47-year-old celebrity chef was a judge on Channel Seven’s My Kitchen Rules – a competitive cooking show infamous for its manipulative editing.

During his years on the show, Pete turned a blind eye to the egregious way in which some contestants were portrayed as ‘bullies’ and ‘villains’.

In reality, many of these unlucky participants weren’t bad people at all.

Oops: The full interview showed him rambling endlessly and failing to answer basic questions

Oops: The full interview showed him rambling endlessly and failing to answer basic questions

But footage had been spliced together with a healthy dose of dramatic music and suddenly they became public enemy number one.

Pete, who earned millions working in the media but now claims not to own a television, never once spoke up when contestants were being crucified on Twitter over their negative portrayals.

But when he found himself on the receiving end of bad press, he recorded the full interview as an insurance policy in case he didn’t like the edit.

Double standard: For a decade, the 47-year-old celebrity chef was a judge on Channel Seven's My Kitchen Rules - a competitive cooking show infamous for its manipulative editing. Pictured: the 2018 cast of My Kitchen Rules

Double standard: For a decade, the 47-year-old celebrity chef was a judge on Channel Seven’s My Kitchen Rules – a competitive cooking show infamous for its manipulative editing. Pictured: the 2018 cast of My Kitchen Rules

Pete may claim he’s all about ‘freedom’ and ‘asking questions’, but this sneaky move proves that he’s not quite as laid-back as it seems.

Perhaps the most vocal critics of MKR during its heyday were Sonya Mefaddi and Hadil Faiza, who were kicked off for ‘bullying’ in the 2018 season.

After their unceremonious exit, the pair accused producers of using them for ratings and conspiring to oust them for being the ‘best cooks’.

Silence: During his years on the show, Pete turned a blind eye to the egregious way in which some contestants - like Sonya Mefaddi (left) and Hadil Faiza (right) - were portrayed as 'bullies' and 'villains'

Silence: During his years on the show, Pete turned a blind eye to the egregious way in which some contestants – like Sonya Mefaddi (left) and Hadil Faiza (right) – were portrayed as ‘bullies’ and ‘villains’

‘We’ve been extremely disappointed with our experience and treatment by the show,’ they wrote on their joint Instagram account at the time.

‘Imagine how we feel watching the episodes back when the episodes have been extremely tampered with (the amount of editing is insane).

‘Twelve to 14 hours of footage… majority of airtime is on us because they want to build us up for ratings which equal $$$$ to the network.’

They continued: ‘I assure you people have acted a lot worse than us on the table, that hasn’t been aired.

‘We will both be happy when we’re off air because MKR have bullied us enough, constantly targeting us because we were unfairly dismissed and the only way they could justify this was to make us look so bad!’

Made for YouTube: Pete's version of the 60 Minutes interview saw him share his bizarre views on the COVID-19 pandemic, his own experience with modern medicine and his reasoning for sharing dangerous and scientifically-disproved theories

Made for YouTube: Pete’s version of the 60 Minutes interview saw him share his bizarre views on the COVID-19 pandemic, his own experience with modern medicine and his reasoning for sharing dangerous and scientifically-disproved theories

Meanwhile, Pete’s version of the 60 Minutes interview saw him share his bizarre views on the COVID-19 pandemic, his own experience with modern medicine and his reasoning for sharing dangerous and scientifically-disproved theories.

In the unaired footage, he explained he had once supported mainstream medicine, but developed a ‘sense of skepticism and suspicion’ as he got older.

‘We as human beings are a collection of our experiences, of our learnings. When people who are presented with something that is different from that, it is shocking,’ he said.

He also gave a long-winded answer to the simple question of whether or not coronavirus exists, and even suggested he wasn’t at risk of contracting the virus because of his remarkable immune system.

Superman? He gave a long-winded answer to the simple question of whether or not coronavirus exists, and even suggested he wasn't at risk of contracting the virus because of his remarkable immune system

Superman? He gave a long-winded answer to the simple question of whether or not coronavirus exists, and even suggested he wasn’t at risk of contracting the virus because of his remarkable immune system

Pete has faced mounting criticism for his dangerous anti-vaccination and COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and viewers initially slammed 60 Minutes for giving those ideals a platform on the show.

But the program only aired snippets of the entire interview, and also included warnings from health experts who urged people to follow the advice of professionals.

In the version that aired on 60 Minutes, Evans suggested that he feared for his life due to his public profile and polarising opinions.

‘If I disappear or have a weird accident, it wasn’t an accident,’ he said.

‘There has been too many coincidences out there in the world for people who have questioned certain things… Sometimes those people don’t last very long.’  

WHY VACCINES ARE IMPORTANT

Immunisation is a simple, safe and effective way of protecting people against harmful diseases before they come into contact with them.

Immunisation not only protects individuals, but also others in the community, by reducing the spread of preventable diseases.

Research and testing is an essential part of developing safe and effective vaccines.

In Australia, vaccines must pass strict safety testing before the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) will register them for use. Approval of vaccines can take up to 10 years.

Before vaccines become available to the public, large clinical trials test them on thousands of people.

High-quality studies over many years have compared the health of large numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Medical information from nearly 1.5 million children around the world have confirmed that vaccination does not cause autism.

People first became concerned about autism and immunisation after the medical journal The Lancet published a paper in 1998. This paper claimed there was a link between the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism. Since then, scientists have completely discredited this paper. The Lancet withdrew it in 2010 and printed an apology. The UK’s General Medical Council struck the author off the medical register for misconduct and dishonesty.

Source: Australian Department of Health